| |
According to Matthew?
Matthew (of the self-titled biblical "gospel") can give no actual account of the "alleged crucifixion." How reliable can his writings be?
- Approximately ninety-five percent of the 661 verses in Mark are either reproduced or substantially represented in Matthew.
- 350 of the verses in Mark are either reproduced or substantially represented in Luke.
- Only 31 of the 661 verses found in Mark are not represented in either Matthew or Luke.
The gospels of Luke and Mark may very well have followed the pattern of Matthew, which was written by Paul, and is the first gospel he wrote. How do we know this? Let's look at a verse from the Book of Matthew:
Matthew 9:9 "And as Jesus passed forth from thence, he saw a man, named Matthew, sitting at the receipt of custom: and he saith unto him, follow me. And he arose, and followed him."
...Who is speaking about Matthew in this quote? As you see, Matthew could not have written this gospel.
Source: The Degree of Christ-ism
The Beatles
The rock group "The Beatles," (photo) brought druid, rock music to the United States in the 1960's A.D. They influenced people, and the doors were opened to witchcraft and the "occult world" with their satanic beats.
Source: The Year 2000 A.D. & What To Expect...
Related: The Aquarian Conspiracy
Etymology of Shabazz
The name Shabazz is thought to be an Arabic word. It is actually made up of two words shah which is Persian for the word king or ruler, and Bazz which is an Arabic word meaning falcon which is the head of Horus (photo), symbol of the son of Osiris and Isis, who in Sumerian were Ishtar and Dummuzi. This Horus was Tammuz or Yahweh, later to be known as Christ, from the Hindu Krishna was their Messiah or Mahdi.
However, the name Shabazz itself comes from the word Sheshbazzar that literally means "sun worshippers" or "fire worshipper."
Source: Our Bondage
|
Archive 
